Skip to content
Identity Maturity Index 2026 Energy
The gap The cost Takeaways Download the report
Sector report · Energy

The identity gap in Dutch energy

Measuring the distance between what customers expect and what suppliers deploy.

NIQ Growth Spaces, energy sector (n=508 NL, n=512 BE, April 2026) · Identity Maturity Index 2026

36
identity maturity, the lowest score of any sector in the Index
57%
of consumers want an external ID app to confirm a new customer’s identity
15.1%
of Dutch households switched energy supplier in 2025
€688
the largest welcome bonus on offer, paid before anyone is verified

No consumer market in the Netherlands is easier to leave than energy. A household can compare the whole market in a few minutes, switch on a price difference and be with a new supplier within a month. In 2025, 15.1% of Dutch households did exactly that, spread across 61 licensed suppliers.

The other sectors in the Identity Maturity Index 2026 report had some brakes against this volatility. Insurance has an annual renewal window and telecom has contract terms and handset subsidies. Energy has neither of those brakes, so suppliers buy their growth instead, and welcome bonuses have become the standard way to do it.

Two years ago

Suppliers offering a bonus

12 · 12% of offers

A bonus was the exception, used by a handful of suppliers on a small share of contracts.

Now

Suppliers offering a bonus

20 · 41% of offers

Four in ten contract offers now carry a bonus, the largest reaching €688 on a one-year fixed contract.

Source: ACM Energiemonitor, January 2026

Add the comparison platform’s commission and the marketing spend that put the offer in front of the household, and every new customer comes with a known, rising, up-front cost. That customer can then leave again on a price change a year later. In this context, two things matter more than anywhere else: how many people who start a registration actually finish it, and how well the supplier knows who it has signed.

The customer nobody verified

A supplier that onboards through a form and a bank account number has a billing relationship, not a verified customer. That difference remains mostly invisible until something goes wrong: a contract signed in someone else’s name, a call centre confirming identity with details anyone can find, a move where nobody can tell whether the person asking is the account holder.

The ACM has warned about misleading acquisition practices in the sector, including consumers being told their supplier was about to go bankrupt so they would switch quickly. That is a sales problem on the surface, but an identity problem underneath: when contracts can be concluded at a distance, at speed, on a name and an address alone, the supplier’s own certainty about who it signed is lower than it should be.

The Identity Maturity Index

In April 2026, itsme asked NielsenIQ to find out how well providers handle identity, from the customer’s perspective. More than 4,000 consumers in Belgium and the Netherlands participated, including 508 Dutch energy customers. For the four moments where a supplier has to know who you are, consumers stated how their supplier handles it today and how important that moment is to them. That resulted in two scores out of 100: maturity (what suppliers actually do) and importance (what customers expect). The distance between them is the gap.

Dutch energy scores 36. It is the only sector-country pair in the Index below 40, and the only one still at the Legacy stage of the maturity model.

Low scores across every touchpoint

Dutch energy scores between 30 and 38 at all four touchpoints, so no part of the journey stands out as a strength. And the two weakest scores sit at the two moments that decide whether a customer is properly acquired and properly kept: signing the contract and logging in to the app.

Acquisition

Signing a new contract

0 32Maturity 83Importance 100
Retention

Logging in to the app

0 30Maturity 80Importance 100
Onboarding

Confirming a new customer’s identity

0 36Maturity 82Importance 100
Account access

Logging in to the web environment

0 38Maturity 81Importance 100
No Dutch energy supplier is pulling ahead. Every supplier NIQ scored individually comes in below 50 on maturity, while consumer importance stays between 79 and 85. There is no domestic benchmark to catch up to and no incumbent lead to defend, which means the supplier that moves first sets the standard everyone else has to match.

When asked what should be standard practice for confirming a new customer’s identity, Dutch energy customers name an external ID app first, well ahead of every manual alternative. Belgian energy customers say the same at 51%. In both countries the runner-up is a manual fallback, an online form. Nobody picked username and password or a video selfie.

57% of Dutch energy consumers say an external ID app should be the standard way a supplier confirms a new customer’s identity.

Identity Maturity Index 2026

The biggest barrier to sign-up

Product teams often assume customers will push back on stronger verification, like an external identity app. The data says the opposite. Of every method tested, the two involving an ID app are the least likely to cost a supplier the customer. The video selfie is the biggest barrier in the entire study, and the energy sector uses it more often than any of the other three sectors measured.

Record a video selfie with my ID card (human reviews later)64%
Schedule an online video call with a staff member49%
Visit a staff member in person45%
Scan and send certain documents32%
Download and set up a new ID app (e.g. DigiD)19%
Use an existing external ID app (e.g. DigiD)10%

Share of consumers who say this requirement would stop them becoming a new customer, across all four sectors and both countries. Source: Identity Maturity Index 2026.

For a supplier paying up to €688 per new household in bonuses alone, a video selfie at registration is a costly choice: 64% of consumers say it would stop them signing up.

Put that next to the revolving door. A supplier commits up to €688 in bonus, plus platform commission, plus marketing, to bring a household to its registration flow, and then asks that household to do the one thing 64% of consumers say would make them walk away.

The two markets sell a near-identical product to near-identical customers. But one has partly deployed a reusable identity layer and the other has not. The result: Belgian energy scores 54 on maturity against the Dutch 36, an 18-point difference that is the largest cross-country gap in the entire Index.

Legacy stage

Netherlands

36

The only sector-country pair in the Index below 40. Reusable identity is largely absent at every touchpoint.

Standard stage

Belgium

54

Some of the largest suppliers offer reusable identity at login, and that alone carries the sector average.

TouchpointMaturity BEMaturity NL
Sign a new contract4132
Confirm a new customer’s identity3936
Log in to web environment7138
Log in to the app5530

Source: Identity Maturity Index 2026. Energy BE and Energy NL.

Most of Belgium’s lead comes from login. At confirming identity and signing a contract, Belgium scores just 39 and 41. So Belgium is not a story about a mature sector. It is a story about one touchpoint, done properly, by part of the market. Where a reusable identity method is deployed, the score at that touchpoint roughly doubles: Dutch web login scores 38 for the same reason Belgian web login scores 71.

But there is also a second, less comfortable lesson from this data. When a strong method is offered next to username and password, plenty of customers take the familiar option and the score settles in the middle. That is why Belgian web login lands at 71 rather than 90. What separates a mature identity stack from an immature one is not which methods a supplier offers, but whether the strongest one is the default way in.

Eneco was the first Belgian energy supplier to integrate itsme for login to its customer environment, and Engie followed. Those two suppliers carry the Belgian sector average. Deploying reusable identity at login alone would take Dutch energy from the weakest score in the Index to a competitive one.

Every point of low maturity score shows up as a real cost: a paid-for sign-up that doesn’t complete, a password reset, a contract nobody can prove was agreed. These costs land in four different budgets with four different owners, and none of them is labelled “identity”, so they’re easy to miss.

€688
the largest welcome bonus on the Dutch market. With bonuses on 41% of offers, the loss of acquisition costs written off when a household drops out at the identity step is larger and better documented than in any other sector.
$70
the average cost of a single password reset. With app login scoring 30 and web login at 38, every reset is a support contact. A customer locked out of their meter readings can switch supplier in ten minutes.
Source: Forrester
64%
of consumers say a video selfie with their ID card would stop them becoming a customer. Energy uses that method more than any other sector, at the final step of an acquisition it has already paid for.
Source: Identity Maturity Index 2026
$4.44M
the global average cost of a data breach. Energy sits inside NIS2 as an essential sector, which raises the bar on authentication and audit trails and makes a password-only architecture harder to defend.

On 1 January 2026, the Energiewet replaced the Elektriciteitswet 1998 and the Gaswet, and with them the rules on energy contracts, switching and termination. Its effect on identity is indirect, but substantial.

01

Clearer contracts

Suppliers must summarise duration, rates and cancellation terms before signing, and can only charge an exit fee if the terms say so clearly. Both assume the supplier can prove what was agreed, and an emailed PDF is weak evidence next to a qualified e-signature tied to a verified identity.

02

Data in the customer’s control

The person entitled to the data (the datarechthebbende) can ask for their energy data to be shared with a provider of their choice. That only works if the supplier can establish, at that moment, that the person giving consent is entitled to give it.

03

Consumers already expect it

75% of Dutch consumers want to decide which data they share with companies, and 58% want more control over who holds it. The Energiewet makes consent-driven data sharing an operational requirement in energy.

This turns identity from a login feature into a compliance requirement. A verified identity confirms who is making a request, records that the request was made, and does it at an assurance level that holds up when someone asks for evidence later.

This is not four separate touchpoint problems waiting for four separate fixes. Adding verification at registration while login stays on a password, or strengthening login while contracts are still signed by emailed PDF, improves one number but leaves the patchwork underneath. What will actually improve the score is one trusted identity layer that allows users to verify, log in and sign at every point in the customer journey.

The timing favours whoever moves first. By the end of 2026, every EU member state must offer a digital identity wallet at eIDAS Level of Assurance High. Public services and banking go first, with energy behind them. For now, reusable identity in Dutch energy is a competitive choice rather than a compliance obligation, but it won’t stay that way.

itsme is now available to every Dutch energy supplier, operating in the Netherlands since June 2026 at the level the EU Digital Identity Wallet will require. It covers identity checks at registration, passwordless login on web and app, qualified e-signatures for contracts and renewals, and transaction confirmation, all on the systems you already have. You can go live one touchpoint at a time, so there’s no full rebuild and you set the pace.

Key takeaways

  • Dutch energy has the weakest identity infrastructure in the Index: it scores 36, the only sector-country pair below 40, against consumer importance of 80 to 83.
  • The market that most needs identity has invested in it the least: 15.1% of households switched energy suppliers in 2025 and four in ten offers carry a welcome bonus of up to €688.
  • Consumers have already chosen: 57% want an external ID app to confirm their identity, and only 10% say an existing ID app would put them off.
  • The Energiewet makes identity a compliance question as well as a commercial one: consent-driven data sharing, clearer contracts and justified exit fees all depend on proving who agreed to what.
  • The window is open, and narrow. No Dutch supplier has integrated reusable identity yet, so the first one sets the benchmark.

Get the full report

See how each touchpoint scores, how Dutch energy compares to Belgium, and what closes the gap. Download "The identity gap in Dutch energy" in full.

Loading the download form…